Found this fun little interactive map on the Los Angeles Times website and I thought you might enjoy playing with it like I did.

Enjoy,

Wasn’t going to make any further comments, but an article I just read made me laugh. It proves my point that the left is so upset over the fact that Obama doesn’t have this thing locked down. Here’s the article and my rebuttal will follow:

Jim VandeHei, John F. Harris

Sat Aug 30, 9:57 AM ET

The selection of a running mate is among the most consequential and the most defining decisions a presidential nominee can make. John McCain’s pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says a lot about his decision-making — and some of it is downright breathtaking.

We knew McCain is a politician who relishes improvisation and likes to go with his gut. But it is remarkable that someone who has repeatedly emphasized experience in this campaign named an inexperienced governor he barely knew to be his No. 2. Whatever you think of the pick, here are six things it tells us about McCain:

1. He’s desperate. Let’s stop pretending this race is as close as national polling suggests. The truth is McCain is essentially tied or trailing in every swing state that matters — and too close for comfort in several states, such as Indiana and Montana, that the GOP usually wins pretty easily in presidential races. On top of that, voters seem very inclined to elect Democrats in general this election — and very sick of the Bush years.

McCain could easily lose in an electoral landslide. That is the private view of Democrats and Republicans alike.

McCain’s pick shows he is not pretending. Politicians, even “mavericks” like McCain, play it safe when they think they are winning — or see an easy path to winning. They roll the dice only when they know that the risks of conventionality are greater than the risks of boldness.

The Republican brand is a mess. McCain is reasonably concluding that it won’t work to replicate George W. Bush and Karl Rove’s electoral formula, based around national security and a big advantage among Y chromosomes, from 2004.

“She’s a fresh new face in a party that’s dying for one — the antidote to boring white men,” a campaign official said.

Palin, the logic goes, will prompt voters to give McCain a second look — especially women who have watched Democrats reject Hillary Rodham Clinton for Barack Obama.

The risks of a backlash from choosing someone so unknown and so untested are obvious. In one swift stroke, McCain demolished what had been one of his main arguments against Obama.

“I think we’re going to have to examine our tag line, ‘dangerously inexperienced,’” a top McCain official said wryly.

2. He’s willing to gamble — bigtime. Let’s face it: This is not the pick of a self-confident candidate. It is the political equivalent of a trick play or, as some Democrats called it, a Hail Mary pass in football. McCain talks incessantly about experience, and then goes and selects a woman he hardly knows, who hardly knows foreign policy and who can hardly be seen as instantly ready for the presidency.

He is smart enough to know it could work, at least politically. Many Republicans see this pick as a brilliant stroke, because it will be difficult for Democrats to run hard against a woman in the wake of the Hillary Clinton drama. Will this push those disgruntled Hillary voters McCain’s way? Perhaps. But this is hardly aimed at them: It is directed at the huge bloc of independent women who could decide this election — especially those who do not see abortion as a make-or-break issue.

McCain has a history of taking dares. Palin represents his biggest one yet.

3. He’s worried about the political implications of his age. Like a driver overcorrecting out of a swerve, he chooses someone who is two years younger than the youthful Obama and 28 years younger than he is. (He turned 72 on Friday.) The father-daughter comparison was inevitable when they appeared next to each other.

4. He’s not worried about the actuarial implications of his age. He thinks he’s in fine fettleand Palin wouldn’t be performing the only constitutional duty of a vice president, which is standing by in case a president dies or becomes incapacitated. If he were really concerned about an inexperienced person sitting in the Oval Office, we would be writing about vice presidential nominee Mitt Romney or Tom Ridge or Condoleezza Rice.

There is no plausible way McCain could say that he picked Palin, who was only elected governor in 2006 and whose most extended public service was as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska (population 8,471), because she was ready to be president on Day One.

Nor can McCain argue that he was looking for someone he could trust as a close adviser. Most people know the staff at the local Starbucks better than McCain knows Palin. They met for the first time last February at a National Governors Association meeting in Washington. Then, they spoke again — by phone — on Sunday while she was at the Alaska state fair and he was at home in Arizona.

McCain has made a mockery out of his campaign’s longtime contention that Barack Obama is too dangerously inexperienced to be commander in chief. Now, the Democratic ticket boasts 40 years of national experience (four years for Obama and 36 years for Joe Biden of Delaware), while the Republican ticket has 26 (McCain’s four years in the House and 22 in the Senate).

The McCain campaign has made a calculation that most voters don’t really care about the national experience or credentials of a vice president, and that Palin’s ebullient personality and reputation as a reformer who took on cesspool politics in Alaska matters more.

5. He’s worried about his conservative base. If he had room to maneuver, there were lots of people McCain could have selected who would have represented a break from Washington politics as usual. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman comes to mind (and it certainly came to McCain’s throughout the process). He had no such room. GOP stalwarts were furious over trial balloons about the possibility of choosing a supporter of abortion rights, including the possibility that he would reach out to his friend.

Palin is an ardent opponent of abortion who was previously scheduled to keynote the Republican National Coalition for Life’s “Life of the Party” event in the Twin Cities this week.

“She’s really a perfect selection,” said Darla St. Martin, the co-director of the National Right to Life Committee. It is no secret McCain wanted to shake things up in this race — and he realized he was limited to a shake-up conservatives could stomach.

6. At the end of the day, McCain is still McCain. People may find him a refreshing maverick or an erratic egotist. In either event, he marches to his own beat.

On the upside, his team did manage to play to the media’s love of drama, fanning speculation about his possible choices and maximizing coverage of the decision.

On the potential downside, the drama was evidently entirely genuine. The fact that McCain only spoke with Palin about the vice presidency for the first time on Sunday, and that he was seriously considering Lieberman until days ago, suggests just how hectic and improvisational his process was.

In the end, this selection gives him a chance to reclaim the mantle of a different kind of politician intent on changing Washington. He once had a legitimate claim to this: After all, he took on his own party over campaign finance reform and immigration. He jeopardized this claim in recent months by embracing ideas he once opposed (Bush tax cuts) and ideas that appeared politically motivated (gas tax holiday).

Spontaneity, with a touch of impulsiveness, is one of the traits that attract some of McCain’s admirers. Whether it’s a good calling card for a potential president will depend on the reaction in coming days to what, for the moment, looks like the most daring vice presidential selection in generations.

Mike Allen contributed to this story.

Okay, now let’s analyze the analysis shall we?

1. McCain is not desperate, he’s being clever and shrewd. Funny, the polls have been showing a steady decline in Obama’s magic and that’s what’s got the Left so worried. The Dems were hoping to skip the election and go straight to the White House. The fact that the polls have not shown a 20 point lead means something here people.

Experience is a non issue, no American really would vote in someone regards to experience, otherwise Obama would have a 50 point lead or none at all. This is about punishing the party you think did you wrong, or reward the part you think is going to give you more money.

2. Yeah, he’s willing to gamble gentlemen and it will work because a strong President with a weak VP is better than a weak president with a strong VP. Obama has shown everyone he’s not up for the job and told us that himself.

Oh this “Hail Mary Pass” crap is just Dems saying “F**k, he’s a smart man. Maybe we should have forced Obama to let the woman on the ticket after all.”

3. WTF? Worried about his age? If he was, he would have nominated someone closer to his age or a spry 50 year old. A young woman in her forties is meaningless save for the “Hillary vote.”

4. He’s worried about his age in #3, but now he’s not? I repeat myself, WTF? These writers need to stop smoking what they are smoking and make some sense. Personally I’d pick Palin over Obama any day. She’ll only be needed if the Mickster croaks. Obama will be screwing up the country from day one.

5. Duh! The internal politics of the Right has little to do with the election. Cons are loyal as where Dems will sometimes for the Cons, that’s what has the Democratic Party so scared.

6. I really must say it again, WTF? You spend an article attacking the guy and your final point seems to be to praise him. You guys make no sense. I’m done here.

P.S. Mike Allen, don’t be so proud.

I bid adieu,

I’m back to make a few quick points in regards to the arrival of Sarah Palin in the mix. First, I reiterate that I know McCain has made a good choice. Second, the Dems are all upset and whining about the Mickster outsmarting them and making this an actual battle for the White House.

We all know the left side has been pissed for the last eight years and want that prized piece of real estate back. So with the arrival of the One, all on the left have ignored his mistakes, poor judgement, character flaws and lack of real experience and rode the Obama train right to the first station.

On charisma alone the Democrats were going to have the White House again.

Not so fast! Sadly for the left, they’ve just learned that that train is behind schedule, will delay the next leg of the trip and McCain’s caboose has just flown past on the second rail. Obama was in trouble long before this moment and it’s dawning on the Democrats now…

Case in point to the blind ignorance:

Every scandal that hit Obama’s way this year has been ignored, white-washed or plain dismissed. Rev. Wright, Obama’s senate track record, his electoral history which saw him forcing rivals out of the race against him, being an outright racist (he dissed his own grandma) and elitist, having a mentor who’s a socialist drug user…

John Edward’s cheating on his cancer-stricken wife was untouched by the legitimate press for a month (a month!) since the residual Obama effect shielded him. Edwards was making a mighty good VP prospect. Only until after the National Enquirer beat them all to print and threatened to make the liberal media look really bad, did the Dems give the okay signal to CNN and throw Edwards under the nearest donkey.

Obama refused to give the dragon lady the VP slot, since he probably thought the “bitch woman” was going to upstage him, should not be in the White house to begin with and dared to challenge his virility. And that costly mistake will be his biggest regret for the next 4 years.

Now here we are…

Ever since it was announced yesterday that Palin is on the McCain ticket, the left have been going after her with unabashed rancor. It’s funny to watch them squirm and huff.

When Biden was announced, the McCain campaign rightly pointed out that all of Obama’s weaknesses were only heightened by this match up. They fired a salvo that was a direct hit. When it’s their turn what does the Obama campaign do?

Well they point out Obama’s Palin’s lack of foreign experience and how she’s gonna be one heartbeat away from the most powerful job in the world. Obama will be in that position on the first day, that’s far worse.

These analysts and pundits and TV heads seem oblivious to the cunning of the Mickster. For the left to attack her, they have to attack Obama. Palin has become untouchable, she’s the acid-spewing Alien who takes its enemies with it and Sigourney Weaver ain’t around to save Obama’s ass.

Paul Begala, a Democratic strategist and CNN political contributor, claims that McCain’s mind must be checked since Palin is unqualified to be President. She’s only been governor of small state Alaska. In his little article, he points out all the people whom McCain should have picked. Doesn’t make much of a case beyond that.

What Paulie is really worried about; With the radio talk shows pounding endlessly at Obama and his numbers in the polls dropping, he’s no longer a sure thing. The White House is slipping through their fingers, Obama is in trouble and McCain has fired a larger salvo and it was a direct hit.

In response to that, the Obama campaign stated about his running mate; “the thinnest foreign policy experience in history” who is “currently under investigation in her own state.” Yeah, I know that makes it sound like she’s corrupt or something. The story (I’m not deciding if she’s innocent or guilty) as it is;

On July 11, 2008, Palin dismissed Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan for not adequately filling state trooper vacancies, and because he “did not turn out to be a team player on budgeting issues.” She instead offered him a position as executive director of the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, which he turned down.

Her power to fire him is not in dispute, but Monegan alleged that his dismissal may have been an abuse of power tied to his reluctance to fire Palin’s former brother-in-law, Alaska State Trooper Mike Wooten, who had been involved in a divorce and child custody battle with Palin’s sister, Molly McCann.

Palin is currently being investigated by an independent investigator hired by the Alaska Legislature to determine whether she abused her power when she fired Monegan. Palin has admitted that her staff had made at least 25 contacts with public safety officials about firing her sister’s ex-husband, including one where an employee claimed to speak for her although she has stated that he acted without her permission or knowledge.

This entry comes Wikipedia for the record.

Charles Schumer made his own doomsday statement; “A fine person, her lack of experience makes the thought of her assuming the presidency troubling.”

The Dems are so stupid that they don’t know if they open the pandora’s experience box, it only undercuts the Obama Effect. The left say that by selecting her McCain will not be able to use the experience issue against Obama, but who cares. That wasn’t enough ammunition, and so McCain is side-stepping an issue that the left are now raising themselves to the detriment of their own man.

McCain is instead going after those women and the Roman Catholics of the battleground states who may have voted for Obama and will take another look at Palin’s anti-abortion stance, feeling a connection to the Catholic woman who’s now on the ticket. One brilliant mind on TV (I’ve already forgotten who it is) made the obvious statement that Hillary supporters will not rush to vote for a woman, simply because she’s a woman.

Duh! McCain ain’t after them all, only the ones who were looking to vote a woman into the White House for substitive values. Not hard core Dems, but the on-the-fence crowd who’d simply vote for a woman because they believe it’s high time or they share similar ideals.

A similar argument was made by Clinton’s team, when they touted that she won New York and California in the primary, not her opponent. It didn’t matter, Obama still won and those two states aren’t suddenly going to go red because Obama is the candidate.

Ah well, maybe the left can get Michael Moore do one of his fictionalized propaganda pieces, uh I mean unbiased documentaries about how McCain stole the 2008 election.

I bid adieu,

As quickly as Obama killed his chances in winning the 2008 presidential election, John McCain has just made his win a sure thing with a cunning and clever move. The good Senator, earlier today, announced his pick for a running mate;

The Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin.

Who is that, you are asking.

It doesn’t matter. We’ll get to know her soon enough and she is a brilliant choice. In the same way Obama’s pick for VP has shown his own personal weaknesses, McCain has overshadowed that announcement and sniped Obama as the progressive.

Sure this Palin has zero foreign policy experience, what with being a mother of five in the frozen tundra, then a Mayor and now a Governor, who has time to give a s**t about the rest of the world. Regardless of that Palin has proven her political chops in just a few short years and her lack of experience can only remind those in the Obama camp that if she’s not prepared, then neither is The One.

Let’s check out these points;

1. McCain-Palin ‘08 doesn’t sound bad phoentically.

2. Palin’s oldest son Track is in the U.S. Army and about to head off to Iraq.

3. Palin is a good anti-abortion, pro-gun conservative who will please those on the fence about the Mickster.

4. Hillary Clinton should really have been the VP choice for the democrats, but they are too stupid to realize.

So much can change in so little time.

Don’t get me wrong, I still hate McCain and I won’t vote for him. But he’s got a little of my respect back for being a shrewd mofo. Seeing that disenfranchised Hillary supporters might turn his way, as well as numerous independents, McCain has only himself to screw it up now. Short of God himself coming down from the heavens and declaring Obama as His personal choice, there is no chance in Hell that the Messiah - uh, two bit huckster politician will get elected.

Wow! I am so excited to see how this turns out. We have a lot of “firsts” going on in this election. The first time a black man is a Presidential candidate, the first time a woman will become Vice-President and the first time that I’m rooting for the Republican ticket.

I bid adieu,

    A major update on things are in order. The so called veepstakes is all the rage in the news and God do I hate that lame a** term.

So many different names were going around but the choice has been made. Obama said to himself, I want to win the White House, I want to be President and I am dropping in the polls. So I shall make the choice that guarantees my failure in November’s election.

Presidential Failure Senator Barack Obama (D) has selected the Senator from Delaware Joe Biden (D).

That’s all she wrote folks!

John McCain should be very happy right now. He’s going to be the next president and no matter how much bulls**t spin the dems put on this choice, their boy* will not win. He will not get back on track, his poll numbers will not go back up, he’s D.O.A., Dead On Arrival.

*- Is not meant to be a derogatory racial remark. I use “boy” as in democratic candidate, hopeful champion. THE ONE.

    First we should analyze the situation and the new running mate of Mr. Obama. Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) is described by CNN’s bio page as;

“The lawyer is serving his sixth term as U.S. senator from Delaware, and once ran for president in 1988.”

So I infer from that statement, Senator Biden is both a lawyer and a politician and failed twice to receive the nomination from his party. Wow! He seems as right for the job as Obama does.

In the case of this year’s primary he came in fifth before dropping out with no delegates or super-delegates to his name. His message got out to many people in his party it would appear. As for his occupations, well do you trust him? I have two words for you if you say yes; JOHN EDWARDS.

    Next, let us discuss the purely superficial aspect to this ticket. Obama-Biden ‘08 does not roll off the tongue without doing some damage. It sounds quite ridiculous actually, didn’t anyone pick that up. Does Barack have an ad man or two in his campaign headquarters?Obama-Biden sounds like a disease to me.

Man: “Honey I just went to the doctor today for my annual check-up.”

Woman: “Well what did he say?”

Man: “It’s not good dear. I have Obamabiden syndrome.”

Woman: “Oh no, what does that mean?”

Man: “Well, I’ll suffer from delusions of grandeur, develop a need to hate being a white guy, lose my ability to reach the common folk, develop a Moses complex and finally make real bad choices.”

Woman: “That sucks.”

No one will be able to say the name of this ticket with a straight face, I’m telling you.

    Okay let’s talk about the business of politics. Biden’s from the state of Delaware and Obama won that state in the primary so Biden brings nothing to the table other than his 35 year history in Washington. Which is actually a con and not a pro, because in selecting Mr. Biden, Obama has effectively cut himself short by indirectly telling the world that Biden is the experience you want and the experience I don’t have as your newly elected president.

And in fact Obama said just that; “Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama introduced Sen. Joe Biden to the nation as his running mate on Saturday, telling supporters he is ‘a leader who is ready to step in and be president.’”

Yeah that’s encouraging, Obama is already undermining his position claiming his VP is ready to do Obama’s job if the need arrives. But we all know Obama’s not the brightest bulb in Washington. He’s the gifted orator who can’t piece two sentences together without cue cards and a teleprompter.

One might assume that Hillary Clinton didn’t have a chance as VP, what with her impressively vigorous attacks on Obama during the primary. The two were quite the opponents and we all enjoyed them going at it. But all good things must come to an end and the media, uh I mean Obama proved the victor. Oil and water, they said. They will clash, they will butt heads, Clinton will overshadow him everyone said.

So Hillary is out and Biden is the guy. He’s not Clinton and he’s a perfect running mate. But…

This quote comes from the McCain camp who were effectively smart to be ready to fire a salvo;

“‘There has been no harsher critic of Barack Obama’s lack of experience than Joe Biden,’ the McCain campaign spokesman Ben Porritt gave in a written statement.

And that is quite true, during the primary (when Biden was still in it of course) he attacked Obama with the best of him. Here’s a quote Obama wishes his number two never said;

“‘Who among us is going to be able on Day One to step in and end the war? Who among us understands what to do about Pakistan? Who among us is going to pick up the phone and immediately interface with Putin and tell him to lay off Georgia because Saakashvili is in real trouble. Who among us knows what they’re doing? I have 35 years of experience.”

Jeez from the sound of that, it seems that Biden doesn’t think Obama truly has what’s needed to sit in the big chair. Wait a second…It almost sounds like Hillary is his running mate.

That’s funny, Obama gets all the grief of the Clinton effect with none of the perks. No swing states, no women voters, no disenfranchised poor people hoping for another magical Clinton windfall. Too bad Obama.

    What do Clinton supporters think? Well according to media sources, Obama’s general snub of the dragon lady has numerous members of her circle angry and those who wanted Obama to show her even the slightest amount of respect received none of that. No phone calls, no short list, not even a consultation on who might be better at the job than she.

Say goodbye to the White House. Obama f**ked up bad. He’s going to lose. I’d bet all that I am and have to that effect.

I bid adieu,

I discovered a site called Age of Autism today while on a quest for information on where Obama and McCain stand on vaccinations; seems neither one gives a straight answer.

“Would you support a federal right for families and individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?
OBAMA: I support screening for a wide variety of diseases and disorders. Early diagnosis and early intervention are the best practice for most illnesses. I believe that every American has the right to access these screenings, and I believe that every American has the right also to refuse these screenings voluntarily if they so choose. I also support a thorough and independent review of our nation’s vaccination policies.

Are you satisfied that the federal vaccine approval process is free of conflicts of interests, transparent and rigorous?
OBAMA: As President, I will conduct a thorough examination of all federal programs to ensure that they are effective and operating in the best interests of the American people. And I will ensure that sound and unbiased science, not ideology, guides decisions made in my administration.”

I don’t think the question asked about screening; it asked if he supported a federal right for families and individuals to make their own choices on vaccinations. He responded by saying he supports screening for diseases. What does that have to do with the idea of protecting individual’s rights?

I can understand the comment about his wanting science and not ideology to guide decisions, but isn’t that impossible considering science itself only observes and can not choose? Science gives us something to work with and we then make decisions and choices using our personal ideology to filter what science has shown us. Science isn’t moral, it leaves that to the person interpreting the science. Science simply says, this is, this isn’t, this may be. How can you not get ideology involved?

A commenter on the Washington Post blog brought up this tidbit:

The CDC is still studying the issue:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/documents/vaccine_studies.pdf
The Autism and Biopsy Study
This study is investigating whether the MMR vaccine may cause autism by a mechanism involving persistent measles virus infection in the intestine. Researchers are examining the intestinal tissue of children with autism for the presence of measles virus.
Scheduled completion: September 2008

AND

Immunizations and
Possible
Developmental
CDC is working with the National Institutes of Health on a study to evaluate whether the MMR vaccine is
linked with developmental regression, which occurs in a subset of children with autism. Scheduled completion: To be determined

If the issue was truly closed, why would the CDC and others continue to study it? (Those are hardly the only studies going on)

There’s far too much information to fit everything into one post; this is really the tip of the iceberg as I continue trying to find out where Obama and McCain stand on this issue.

I’m about to sell out right now, because I’m going to plug someone’s book and recommend everyone read it. I do this of my own free will, and to my knowledge I will not be getting a commission or a free copy for my efforts.

The title of this life changing epic is Give me a Break!

And the author is 20/20 anchor, crusader for the little guy, libertarian guru and awesome ’stache wearing dude John Stossel. That’s him on the cover and for those liberals out there who think themselves so awesome, just read the book cover.

My wife recommended the book to me since she knows I’m always a crusader for those who are weak and against th0se who are rich and greedy. I used to think liberals were the s**t and that all Republicans were greedy monsters who ate children while flipping gold coins over their fingers.

I know now that I am wrong and I am sorry for my past.

But as Glenn Beck likes to forgive people who have realized their viewpoints may be off and find the conviction to change, I am doing so now. Give me another chance Glenn! But don’t invite me to the fold yet, I am more libertarian than ever before and I feel liberated, exhilarated, constipated… heh! Last one is a joke!

I had enjoyed several of Mr. Stossel’s reports on ABC, the ease at which he pointed out the lies and hypocrisies of those in power; both liberal and conservative alike, how propaganda was used by everyone and even I’m guilty of such things. We all are and it’s quite possible that my way of thinking is just as wrong as the next guy. I do believe that is the message that Stossel has been trying to convey.

The book itself is quite anecdotal, similar to the styling of one of George Carlin’s or Bill Maher’s books. The Ann Coulter book I read was slightly less personal, though no less interesting. I’m thinking about reading perhaps a liberal book to round out my education, regardless of that my current political beliefs should not change anytime soon.

Political beliefs are not exactly the reason behind the book, it’s more about how politics gets problematic when people get involved. Isn’t that always the way? The funny thing is, I assumed that included big business as well, but the corporations may not be the root of all evil, only the occasional CEO who’s greed is insatiable. Mr. Stossel doesn’t believe that capitalism is all that bad, but he thinks that victim’s rights groups and the lawyers have targeted the wrong group. And I see the point he tries to make.

What does he think about government? Well  John Stossel is no fool and like the rest of us, his opinion is clear on that. Government is a broken system, a tyrant that grows larger and larger taking its fill on the back of people and burying them with endless and quite pointless rules and regulations. The one chapter detailing the EPA and the fine work it has done to wipe out whole towns is quite shocking.

The most curious part of the book to me was the beginning when we learn Stossel’s start in the job and his early consumer advocate work, how he began to see the lies and misinformation which would seep into our daily lives. The reaction by his co-workers and those who once praised him (I’m looking at you Ralph Nader!) was understandable. No one likes a rat even when his intentions are honorable or noble. Ever hear something call the “Blue Wall?”

If you, dear reader, is having a crisis of faith, conscience, idealism, or anything else that I have neglected to mention, I suggest you run to your local library and pick up the book RIGHT NOW!!!!!!

Or buy it! But I remind you again, I’m getting nothing out of the deal. A side from the satisfaction in helping one more person to see the libertarian light. Yes I am trying to convert the world to my faith and I need 4 more people before I get my new 20 inch plasma screen TV in HD.

Oh, one last thing, John Stossel has written another book which I have not yet read, but intend to do so in the near future. It is called Myths, Lies, And Downright Stupidity.

I bid adieu,

I don’t want to be the type of person to drag out a tragedy, but something has developed in the death of Heath Ledger. It seems investigators are asking questions about the origins of some of the prescription drugs he was using when he died.

Mary-Kate Olsen is on a short list to be asked those questions and her lawyers are refusing to allow her to talk unless she’s granted immunity. I’m trying to be objective here, but that doesn’t sound very smart for Ms. Olsen. I suppose the only way I can wash my hands of it, is give you all the link (assuming you haven’t noticed it online already) and judge for yourself.

We sure do love to judge don’t we?

I bid adieu,

Things about Obama are coming out that is beginning to shake my belief that he’s a sure lock to win president. Drugs, Rev. Wright, Commie Mentors, refusing to debate McCain with teleprompters…

It’s a shame that Hillary’s people weren’t better investigators, she could have locked this one up right from the very start.

You know it just might be possible for McCain to pull this one off, though I still think he’s a two face flip-flopping ***hole and he’s going to prove that by being Dubya 2: The Sequel while in office. McCain is working so hard to prove he’s a Republican that he’s going down the far right path. And a libertarian such as myself knows the right path is as wrong as the left path.

The middle path is the only way to go.

Wow! Interesting how things are shaping up. If Obama was smart (and we all know a man with handlers isn’t) he’d drop on his knees and beg Hillary to be on the ticket. It just may be the only way he pulls this one out of proverbial fire. He can’t use legal loopholes to force McCain out of this fight.

I dare not predict a winner at this time!

I bid adieu,

I was looking for dirt on Obama and stumbled on an interesting site, and despite the Equal Fairly Righteousness Act of 1807, I have only the one link to give.

Obama

McCain doesn’t seem to have a hate site attached to him yet. By all means if anyone knows a link, than the legality of this entry cannot be denied.

Odd that the Liberals haven’t already gone after him with such a thing? I’m guessing the Obama site is secretly a Liberal machination so they can scream “unfair” at their hated rivals.

Enjoy the site and I bid adieu,